Board · Wed, Nov 4 · 7:00 PM ET · Week 10Week 10 report
Toledo
6–2 · Ours #73Our rank on the rankings page. The board's line comes from the betting model, which sees more than this one number.
38–14Our projected score
Sacramento State
2–7 · Ours #137Our rank on the rankings page. The board's line comes from the betting model, which sees more than this one number.
Win chanceHow often each team wins the game outright when we play it out thousands of times from our line.TOL 92%
TOL 92%SpreadThe betting line right now: the middle of the sportsbooks we track, updated through the day.—oursOur computer's point spread for this game, built from team stats, not from the betting odds. Read it like a betting line: −7 means we have that team winning by 7. TOL −23.4
TotalThe betting line right now: the middle of the sportsbooks we track, updated through the day.—oursOur computer's projected combined score for both teams, built from team stats, not from the betting odds. 52.3
Our call · No priceNeither DraftKings nor FanDuel is offering our side at our number right now, so there is no price to judge.—
Quarterbackslast game's starter · most dropbacks in each team's last game
Toledo
No passer on record this season
Jackson Sharman6 starts this year
- EPA / dropbackExpected points added per dropback: passes, sacks (college play-by-play logs scrambles as runs). The rank is among the 128 FBS passers with 15+ dropbacks per team game.
- −0.10121st
- Comp %
- 56.8
- TD
- 8
- Turnovers
- 55 INT · 0 fum
- Sacked
- 6
The matchupeach offense against the defense it faces · FBS rank in the colored cell
| Sacramento Stateoffense | Defense edge · 5 of 5 | defenseToledo | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 137th | −0.17 | Overall efficiencyEfficiencyExpected points added per play. FBS average: +0.08. | −0.02 | 38th |
| 133rd | 36.3% | Success rateSuccessShare of plays that keep the offense on schedule. FBS average: 43.3%. | 33.9% | 6th |
| 135th | −0.21 | PassingPassingExpected points added per dropback. FBS average: +0.09. | +0.02 | 64th |
| 131st | −0.12 | RushingRushingExpected points added per run. FBS average: +0.07. | −0.07 | 23rd |
| 136th | 7.6% | Big playsBig playsShare of plays gaining 20+ yards passing or 10+ rushing. FBS average: 12.7%. | 9.0% | 12th |
| Toledooffense | Offense edge · 4 of 5 | defenseSacramento State | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 33rd | +0.17 | Overall efficiencyEfficiencyExpected points added per play. FBS average: +0.08. | +0.02 | 60th |
| 46th | 45.0% | Success rateSuccessShare of plays that keep the offense on schedule. FBS average: 43.3%. | 39.8% | 49th |
| 14th | +0.28 | PassingPassingExpected points added per dropback. FBS average: +0.09. | 0.00 | 56th |
| 83rd | +0.05 | RushingRushingExpected points added per run. FBS average: +0.07. | +0.04 | 73rd |
| 27th | 14.8% | Big playsBig playsShare of plays gaining 20+ yards passing or 10+ rushing. FBS average: 12.7%. | 14.2% | 117th |
Team stats
| Sacramento StateSAC | ToledoTOL | |
|---|---|---|
| Special teams & field position | ||
| Special teamsSpecial teams expected points added per game. | +1.145th | −2.7124th |
| Field positionAverage starting field position against the opponent's, in yards. | +0.771st | +2.046th |
| Drives & pace | ||
| Scoring chancesShare of drives that reach the opponent's 40. | 33%136th | 58%28th |
| Points per chancePoints scored per drive that reaches the opponent's 40. | 3.28119th | 4.0669th |
| Time of possession | 28:5466th | 28:3079th |
| Plays per game | 6487th | 7117th |
| Turnovers & havoc | ||
| Turnover margin | −4 | +5 |
| Giveaways – takeaways | 17 – 13 | 10 – 15 |
| Havoc rateShare of defensive plays with a sack, tackle for loss, interception or forced fumble. | 10.4%130th | 14.6%63rd |
Season so far
Toledo6–2 · 129th-hardest schedule
L
at Michigan State20–30push +10
at Michigan State20–30push +10Wvs Central Connecticut63–10covered −36
W
vs Temple49–48missed −5
vs Temple49–48missed −5W
vs San Diego State41–16covered −2.5
vs San Diego State41–16covered −2.5W
at Ball State39–24missed −21
at Ball State39–24missed −21L
vs Buffalo8–23missed −18.5
vs Buffalo8–23missed −18.5W
at Eastern Michigan34–14covered −7.5
at Eastern Michigan34–14covered −7.5W
vs Western Michigan45–38covered −2.5
vs Western Michigan45–38covered −2.5Sacramento State2–7 · 131st-hardest schedule
Lat Eastern Michigan17–28missed +9
at Eastern Michigan17–28missed +9Wvs Mississippi Valley State52–0covered −38.5
L
at Fresno State3–49missed +17.5
at Fresno State3–49missed +17.5L
vs North Dakota State10–31covered +25
vs North Dakota State10–31covered +25L
vs Massachusetts6–35missed +5
vs Massachusetts6–35missed +5L
at Bowling Green10–38missed +9
at Bowling Green10–38missed +9L
vs Ohio7–48missed +17
vs Ohio7–48missed +17Lat Ball State17–34missed +14.5
at Ball State17–34missed +14.5W
vs Kent State31–10covered +7
vs Kent State31–10covered +7Model cfb_scratch · uncertainty ±15.5 · run Oct 31, 6:20 PM EDT · freezes at kickoff and grades as-is