Board · Sat, Nov 7 · 4:00 PM ET · Week 10Week 10 report
Rice
1–7 · Ours #121Our rank on the rankings page. The board's line comes from the betting model, which sees more than this one number.
26–41Our projected score
North Texas
6–2 · Ours #55Our rank on the rankings page. The board's line comes from the betting model, which sees more than this one number.
Win chanceHow often each team wins the game outright when we play it out thousands of times from our line.UNT 81%
UNT 81%SpreadThe betting line right now: the middle of the sportsbooks we track, updated through the day.—oursOur computer's point spread for this game, built from team stats, not from the betting odds. Read it like a betting line: −7 means we have that team winning by 7. UNT −14.4
TotalThe betting line right now: the middle of the sportsbooks we track, updated through the day.—oursOur computer's projected combined score for both teams, built from team stats, not from the betting odds. 67.2
Our call · No priceNeither DraftKings nor FanDuel is offering our side at our number right now, so there is no price to judge.—
Quarterbackslast game's starter · most dropbacks in each team's last game
Rice
No passer on record this season
Tayven JacksonSenior · 7 starts this year
- EPA / dropbackExpected points added per dropback: passes, sacks (college play-by-play logs scrambles as runs). The rank is among the 128 FBS passers with 15+ dropbacks per team game.
- +0.472nd
- Comp %
- 72.3
- TD
- 17
- Turnovers
- 55 INT · 0 fum
- Sacked
- 4
The matchupeach offense against the defense it faces · FBS rank in the colored cell
| North Texasoffense | Offense edge · 5 of 5 | defenseRice | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | +0.33 | Overall efficiencyEfficiencyExpected points added per play. FBS average: +0.08. | +0.10 | 99th |
| 5th | 50.7% | Success rateSuccessShare of plays that keep the offense on schedule. FBS average: 43.3%. | 43.0% | 92nd |
| 1st | +0.50 | PassingPassingExpected points added per dropback. FBS average: +0.09. | +0.14 | 103rd |
| 40th | +0.13 | RushingRushingExpected points added per run. FBS average: +0.07. | +0.07 | 85th |
| 4th | 17.1% | Big playsBig playsShare of plays gaining 20+ yards passing or 10+ rushing. FBS average: 12.7%. | 13.4% | 102nd |
| Riceoffense | Offense edge · 4 of 5 | defenseNorth Texas | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 68th | +0.08 | Overall efficiencyEfficiencyExpected points added per play. FBS average: +0.08. | +0.16 | 121st |
| 84th | 41.5% | Success rateSuccessShare of plays that keep the offense on schedule. FBS average: 43.3%. | 45.5% | 119th |
| 136th | −0.23 | PassingPassingExpected points added per dropback. FBS average: +0.09. | +0.31 | 133rd |
| 21st | +0.17 | RushingRushingExpected points added per run. FBS average: +0.07. | +0.02 | 68th |
| 117th | 10.5% | Big playsBig playsShare of plays gaining 20+ yards passing or 10+ rushing. FBS average: 12.7%. | 14.2% | 118th |
Team stats
| North TexasUNT | RiceRICE | |
|---|---|---|
| Special teams & field position | ||
| Special teamsSpecial teams expected points added per game. | −2.1119th | −3.4133rd |
| Field positionAverage starting field position against the opponent's, in yards. | −2.0102nd | −9.3138th |
| Drives & pace | ||
| Scoring chancesShare of drives that reach the opponent's 40. | 62%10th | 34%135th |
| Points per chancePoints scored per drive that reaches the opponent's 40. | 4.6523rd | 3.38112th |
| Time of possession | 31:1225th | 30:0041st |
| Plays per game | 7211th | 61120th |
| Turnovers & havoc | ||
| Turnover margin | +1 | −13 |
| Giveaways – takeaways | 11 – 12 | 18 – 5 |
| Havoc rateShare of defensive plays with a sack, tackle for loss, interception or forced fumble. | 12.2%109th | 14.0%73rd |
Season so far
Rice1–7 · 60th-hardest schedule
Wvs Houston Christian31–3covered −22.5
L
at Notre Dame0–52missed +44.5
at Notre Dame0–52missed +44.5L
vs Western Michigan21–28covered +8.5
vs Western Michigan21–28covered +8.5L
at Fresno State24–38missed +13
at Fresno State24–38missed +13L
vs UTSA14–16covered +12.5
vs UTSA14–16covered +12.5L
at East Carolina12–28missed +10
at East Carolina12–28missed +10L
vs Tulsa17–38missed +4.5
vs Tulsa17–38missed +4.5L
at Florida Atlantic49–51covered +9
at Florida Atlantic49–51covered +9North Texas6–2 · 87th-hardest schedule
L
at Indiana16–52covered +40
at Indiana16–52covered +40W
vs UNLV44–6covered +3
vs UNLV44–6covered +3L
at Texas State35–49missed +3
at Texas State35–49missed +3Wvs Houston Christian63–14covered −38.5
Wat Tulsa45–44missed −2.5
at Tulsa45–44missed −2.5W
vs Charlotte50–10covered −28
vs Charlotte50–10covered −28W
at Navy49–39covered −3
at Navy49–39covered −3Wvs Florida Atlantic48–41missed −14.5
vs Florida Atlantic48–41missed −14.5Model cfb_scratch · uncertainty ±15.5 · run Oct 31, 6:20 PM EDT · freezes at kickoff and grades as-is