Oregon
5–3 · Ours #27Our rank on the rankings page. The board's line comes from the betting model, which sees more than this one number.
29–18Our projected score
Michigan State
2–6 · Ours #68Our rank on the rankings page. The board's line comes from the betting model, which sees more than this one number.
Win chanceHow often each team wins the game outright when we play it out thousands of times from our line.ORE 75%
ORE 75%SpreadThe betting line right now: the middle of the sportsbooks we track, updated through the day.—oursOur computer's point spread for this game, built from team stats, not from the betting odds. Read it like a betting line: −7 means we have that team winning by 7. ORE −10.9
TotalThe betting line right now: the middle of the sportsbooks we track, updated through the day.—oursOur computer's projected combined score for both teams, built from team stats, not from the betting odds. 46.4
Our call · No priceNeither DraftKings nor FanDuel is offering our side at our number right now, so there is no price to judge.—
Quarterbackslast game's starter · most dropbacks in each team's last game
Dylan RaiolaJunior · 3 starts this year · 2 relief appearances
- EPA / dropbackExpected points added per dropback: passes, sacks (college play-by-play logs scrambles as runs). The rank is among the 128 FBS passers with 15+ dropbacks per team game.
- −0.02106th
- Comp %
- 64.9
- TD
- 6
- Turnovers
- 22 INT · 0 fum
- Sacked
- 4
New starter last game
Michigan State
No passer on record this season
The matchupeach offense against the defense it faces · FBS rank in the colored cell
| Michigan Stateoffense | Defense edge · 5 of 5 | defenseOregon | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 124th | −0.05 | Overall efficiencyEfficiencyExpected points added per play. FBS average: +0.08. | −0.05 | 30th |
| 85th | 41.5% | Success rateSuccessShare of plays that keep the offense on schedule. FBS average: 43.3%. | 38.0% | 31st |
| 114th | −0.06 | PassingPassingExpected points added per dropback. FBS average: +0.09. | −0.10 | 21st |
| 120th | −0.04 | RushingRushingExpected points added per run. FBS average: +0.07. | 0.00 | 55th |
| 135th | 8.5% | Big playsBig playsShare of plays gaining 20+ yards passing or 10+ rushing. FBS average: 12.7%. | 11.4% | 69th |
| Oregonoffense | Offense edge · 3 of 5 | defenseMichigan State | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 88th | +0.04 | Overall efficiencyEfficiencyExpected points added per play. FBS average: +0.08. | +0.06 | 84th |
| 89th | 41.3% | Success rateSuccessShare of plays that keep the offense on schedule. FBS average: 43.3%. | 43.5% | 96th |
| 71st | +0.07 | PassingPassingExpected points added per dropback. FBS average: +0.09. | +0.13 | 99th |
| 105th | +0.01 | RushingRushingExpected points added per run. FBS average: +0.07. | +0.01 | 58th |
| 39th | 13.8% | Big playsBig playsShare of plays gaining 20+ yards passing or 10+ rushing. FBS average: 12.7%. | 11.1% | 58th |
Team stats
| Michigan StateMSU | OregonORE | |
|---|---|---|
| Special teams & field position | ||
| Special teamsSpecial teams expected points added per game. | +3.210th | +2.320th |
| Field positionAverage starting field position against the opponent's, in yards. | +0.966th | +1.652nd |
| Drives & pace | ||
| Scoring chancesShare of drives that reach the opponent's 40. | 49%86th | 46%100th |
| Points per chancePoints scored per drive that reaches the opponent's 40. | 3.6297th | 4.4738th |
| Time of possession | 19:42138th | 26:36115th |
| Plays per game | 62104th | 6938th |
| Turnovers & havoc | ||
| Turnover margin | −4 | 0 |
| Giveaways – takeaways | 13 – 9 | 15 – 15 |
| Havoc rateShare of defensive plays with a sack, tackle for loss, interception or forced fumble. | 12.4%104th | 15.9%31st |
Season so far
Oregon5–3 · 7th-hardest schedule
W
vs Boise State34–27missed −25
vs Boise State34–27missed −25L
at Oklahoma State31–39missed −24
at Oklahoma State31–39missed −24Wvs Portland State84–0covered −58.5
W
at USC41–27covered −3.5QB change mid-game
at USC41–27covered −3.5QB change mid-gameL
vs UCLA15–17missed −10.5
vs UCLA15–17missed −10.5W
vs Nebraska17–14missed −6.5
vs Nebraska17–14missed −6.5L
at Illinois10–21missed −10
at Illinois10–21missed −10W
vs Northwestern34–26covered −3.5
vs Northwestern34–26covered −3.5Michigan State2–6 · 16th-hardest schedule
W
vs Toledo30–20push −10
vs Toledo30–20push −10W
vs Eastern Michigan35–7covered −17.5
vs Eastern Michigan35–7covered −17.5L
at Notre Dame10–27covered +29
at Notre Dame10–27covered +29Lvs Nebraska13–31missed +6
vs Nebraska13–31missed +6L
at Wisconsin3–31missed +8.5
at Wisconsin3–31missed +8.5Lvs Illinois37–38covered +2.5
vs Illinois37–38covered +2.5Lvs Northwestern21–24covered +7
vs Northwestern21–24covered +7Lat UCLA10–28missed +16
at UCLA10–28missed +16Model cfb_scratch · uncertainty ±15.5 · run Oct 27, 7:26 AM EDT · freezes at kickoff and grades as-is